Ben Tilghman and the philosophy of art: in defense of the «last of the mohicans»

Authors

  • Iraida Nikolayevna Nekhaeva Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2019-4-3-112-118

Keywords:

Tilghman, Wittgenstein, theory of art, language, boundaries

Abstract

The article considers the view on the art of one of the most prominent figure of antiessentialism in modern art philosophy — Ben Tilghman. The radicality of his view lies in the denial of all art theories. According to Tilghman, the role of art theory is excessive and sometimes even harmful. When solving purely practical problems, art requires a practical approach rather than theoretical. Critical analysis of this view on the nature of art allows us to show the true source of its radicalism — the lack of
linguistic feeling, which does not give Tilghman to strictly follow the language game accepted by him, while maintaining the continuity of his own reflections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Iraida Nikolayevna Nekhaeva, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia

Doctor of Philosophy Sciences, Professor of Philosophy Department of Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tyumen; Professor of the Piano Art Department, Tyumen State Institute of Culture.

Downloads


Abstract views: 42

Published

2019-09-25

How to Cite

Nekhaeva И. Н. (2019). Ben Tilghman and the philosophy of art: in defense of the «last of the mohicans». Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 4(3), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2019-4-3-112-118

Issue

Section

Philosophy

Categories