Gilbert Ryle as a critic of phenomenology

Authors

  • Levshin Sergey Vyacheslavovich Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-4-106-112

Keywords:

phenomenology, analytic philosophy, Gilbert Ryle, Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, ordinary language, conceptual analysis

Abstract

The article refers to Gilbert Ryle’s (1900–1976) critical approach to phenomenology as an example of wider topic of analytic and continental philosophy divide. Earlier constructive objections on eidetic intuition, theory of essences, doctrine of intentionality and reduction finally coalesced in Ryle’s total rejection of phenomenology and its universalistic claims. So, it made clear that solving particular puzzles with the method of conceptual analysis is the main feature of analytic philosophy of that time. Such approach should be considered philosophically restricted and insufficient for solving problems posed by phenomenology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Levshin Sergey Vyacheslavovich, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok

Senior Lecturer, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok.

References

(1). Васильев В. В. Что такое аналитическая философия и почему важен этот вопрос? // Философский журнал. 2019. Т. 12, № 1. С. 144–158. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-1-144-158. EDN: KRVPQZ.

Vasilyev V. V. Chto takoye analiticheskaya filosofiya i pochemu vazhen etot vopros? [What is Analytic Philosophy, and Why is it Important to ask?]. Filosofskiy zhurnal. Philosophy Journal. 2019. Vol. 12, no. 1. P. 144–158. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-1-144-158. EDN: KRVPQZ. (In Russ.).

(2). Докучаев И. И. Философия в эпоху господства естествознания: феноменологический идеализм и натуралистические редукции аналитической философии // Вестник Российской христианской гуманитарной академии. 2022. Т. 23, № 2. С. 26–33. DOI: 10.25991/VRHGA.2022.23.2.002. EDN: HWKHSW.

Dokuchaev I. I. Filosofiya v epokhu gospodstva estestvoznaniya: fenomenologicheskiy idealizm i naturalisticheskiye reduktsii analiticheskoy filosofii [Philosophy in the Era of the Dominance of Natural Science: Phenomenological Idealism and Naturalistic Reductions of Consciousness in Analytical Philosophy]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy khristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Review of the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities. 2022. Vol. 23, no. 2. P. 26–33. DOI: 10.25991/VRHGA.2022.23.2.002. EDN: HWKHSW. (In Russ.).

(3). Dummett M. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993. 199 p.

(4). Vrahimis A. Encounters Between Analytic and Continental Philosophy. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2013. 277 p.

(5). Overgaard S. Royaumont Revisited. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 2010. Vol. 18, no. 5. P. 899–924. DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2010.524764.

(6). Vrahimis A. Is the Royaumont Colloquium the Locus Classicus of the Divide Between Analytic and Continental Philosophy? Reply to Overgaard. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 2013. Vol. 21, no. 1. P. 177–188. DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2012.689751.

(7). Chase J., Reynolds J. Russell, Ryle and Phenomenology: An Alternative Parsing of the Ways. Analytic Philosophy: An Interpretive History. Ed. by A. Preston. New York: Routledge, 2017. P. 52–69.

(8). Райл Г. Понятие сознания: пер. с англ. Москва: Идея-Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999. 408 с.

Ryle G. Ponyatiye soznaniya: per. s angl. [The Concept of Mind: trans. from Engl.]. Moscow, 1999. 408 p. (In Russ.).

(9). Борисов Е. В. Гилберт Райл и феноменология // Топос. 2007. № 3 (17). С. 94–99.

Borisov E. V. Gilbert Rayl i fenomenologiya [Gilbert Ryle and Phenomenology]. Topos. 2007. No. 3 (17). P. 94–99. (In Russ.).

(10). Ryle G. Autobiographical. Ryle. Eds. O. P. Wood, G. Pitcher. London: Macmillan, 1970. P. 1–15.

(11). Ryle G. Roman Ingarden: «Essentiale Fragen». Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 1973. Vol. 4, no. 1. P. 72–75. DOI: 10.1080/00071773.1973.11006295.

(12). Ryle G. Sein und Zeit. By Martin Heidegger. Mind. 1929. Vol. 38, no. 151. P. 355–370. DOI: 10.1093/mind/XXXVIII.151.355.

(13). Райл Г. Мартин Хайдеггер. Бытие и время // Топос. 2007. № 3 (17). С. 100–116.

Ryle G. Martin Khaydegger. Bytiye i vremya [Sein und Zeit. By Martin Heidegger]. Topos. 2007. No. 3 (17). P. 100–116. (In Russ.).

(14). Ryle G. Phenomenology. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 1932. Vol. 11, no. 1. P. 68–115. DOI: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/11.1.68.

(15). Ryle G. The Foundations of Phenomenology. By Marvin Farber (Harvard University Press, 1943. Pp. 573. London: Humphrey Milford. English price, 33 s. 6d.). Philosophy. 1946. Vol. 21, no. 80. P. 263–269. DOI: 10.1017/S0031819100005556.

(16). Ryle G. La Phénoménologie contre «The Concept of Mind». Cahiers de Royaumont, Philosophie no. IV, La Philosophie Analytique. Paris: Le Editions Minuit, 1962. P. 65–84. (In Fr.).

(17). Райл Г. Феноменология против «Понятия сознания» // Логос. 2006. № 1 (52). С. 73–88. EDN: VQWUTL.

Ryle G. Fenomenologiya protiv «Ponyatiya soznaniya» [Phenomenology versus «The Concept of Mind»]. Logos. 2006. No. 1 (52). P. 73–88. EDN: VQWUTL. (In Russ.).

(18). Ryle G. Critical Essays: Collected Papers. New York: Routledge, 2009. Vol. 1. 340 p.

(19). Ryle G. Afterword. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 1970. Vol. 1, no. 3. P. 13–14. DOI: 10.1080/00071773.1970.11006134.

(20). Small R. Ryle and Husserl. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 1981. Vol. 12, no. 3. P. 195–210. DOI: 10.1080/00071773.1981.11007543.

(21). Thomasson A. L. Phenomenology and the Development of Analytic Philosophy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 2002. Vol. 40, no. S1. P. 115–142. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2002.tb01926.x.

(22). Brandl J. L. Gilbert Ryle: A Mediator Between Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 2002. Vol. 40, no. S1. P. 143–151. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2002.tb01927.x.

(23). O’Connor J. K. Category Mistakes and Logical Grammar: Ryle’s Husserlian Tutelage. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy / Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale. 2012. Vol. 16, no. 2. P. 235–250. DOI: 10.5840/symposium201216237.

(24). Mays W. Husserl on Ryle’s Review of «Sein Und Zeit». Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 1970. Vol. 1, no. 3. P. 14–15. DOI: 10.1080/00071773.1970.11006135.

(25). Finding Oneself in the Other / Ed. G. A. Cohen. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012. 236 p.

(26). Мамардашвили М. Феноменология – сопутствующий момент всякой философии. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/5477 (дата обращения: 14.09.2025).

Mamardashvili M. Fenomenologiya – soputstvuyushchiy moment vsyakoy filosofii [Phenomenology Is an Accompanying Aspect of Any Philosophy]. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/5477 (accessed: 14.09.2025). (In Russ.).

(27). Гуссерль Э. Картезианские медитации. Москва: Академический Проект, 2010. 229 с.

Husserl E. Kartezianskiye meditatsii [Cartesian Meditations]. Moscow, 2010. 229 p. (In Russ.).

(28). PhilPapers: Online Research in Philosophy. URL: https://philpapers.org/ (accessed: 14.09.2025).

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Levshin С. В. (2025). Gilbert Ryle as a critic of phenomenology. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 10(4), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-4-106-112

Issue

Section

Philosophy

Categories