Proofs in philosophy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-1-109-114

Keywords:

Gilbert Ryle, methods of philosophy, conceptual analysis, proofs, arguments, rules for argumentation, philosophical enquiry.

Abstract

The essay examines the characteristic features of philosophical argumentation. The aims and structure of philosophical argumentation are contrasted with the aims and structure of logical and mathematical proofs. The examples of Plato’s notions of pleasure and Frege’s notions of number are used to demonstrate the peculiarities of the philosophical inquiry practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nekhaev Andrei Viktorovich, Omsk State Technical University

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the History, Philosophy and Social Communications Department, Omsk State Technical University, Omsk; Professor of the Philosophy, Media and Journalism Department, Tyumen State University, Tyumen.

Downloads


Abstract views: 24

Published

2025-02-26

How to Cite

Ryle Г., & Nekhaev А. В. (2025). Proofs in philosophy. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 10(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-1-109-114

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Philosophy

Categories

License

Non-exclusive rights to the article are transferred to the journal in full accordance with the Creative Commons License BY-NC-SA 4.0 «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Worldwide License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0»)

Creative Commons License