We Are Not Human Beings / trans. from Engl. U. V. Dobronravova

Authors

  • Uliana Vladimirovna Dobronravova Omsk Tank-Automotive Engineering Institute, Omsk, Russia
  • D. Parfit All Souls College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-82-95

Keywords:

teletransporter, personal identity, human being, brain, animalism, psychological сriterion

Abstract

The article presents a comparative analysis the views on the problem of personality identity by Neo-Lockeanism
(Shoemaker, Parfit, Lewis) and Animalism (Olson, Snowden, Carter). A certain of main objections to the psychological
criterion (the problem of too many thinkers, the too many persons problem, the thinking parts problem, etc.)
are critically examined. Basic animalist intuitions are refuted by the embodied person view (McMahan).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Uliana Vladimirovna Dobronravova, Omsk Tank-Automotive Engineering Institute, Omsk, Russia

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Senior Lecturer of Humanitarian and Socio-Economic Disciplines Department.

Downloads


Abstract views: 68

Published

2020-12-09

How to Cite

Dobronravova У. В., & Д. Парфит. (2020). We Are Not Human Beings / trans. from Engl. U. V. Dobronravova. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 5(4), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-82-95

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Philosophy

Categories

License

Non-exclusive rights to the article are transferred to the journal in full accordance with the Creative Commons License BY-NC-SA 4.0 «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Worldwide License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0»)

Creative Commons License