On derivative consequence argument

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-66-68

Keywords:

Bogdan Faul, physicalism, laws of nature, free will

Abstract

The article gives critical remarks to the derivative consequence argument proposed by Bogdan Faul. The first critical
remark concerns the ontological status of the laws of nature, the second remark deals with the term «physicalism».
It is demonstrated that conceptual vagueness of the terms used by B. Faul in his article undermines the validity of the
proposed derivative argument.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Danil Nikolayevich Razeev, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of Philosophy of Science and Technology Department.

Downloads


Abstract views: 9

Published

2020-12-09

How to Cite

Razeev Д. Н. (2020). On derivative consequence argument. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 5(4), 66–68. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-66-68

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Philosophy

Categories

License

Non-exclusive rights to the article are transferred to the journal in full accordance with the Creative Commons License BY-NC-SA 4.0 «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Worldwide License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0»)

Creative Commons License