Abortion: pro et contra

Authors

  • Nekhaev Andrei Viktorovich Omsk State Technical University, Omsk, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1358-743X
  • S. Holm University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • J. Lewis The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-2-120-131

Keywords:

induced abortion, moral status arguments, abortion laws, rights of pregnant women, fetal viability

Abstract

The article provides a critical review of some of the most common arguments actively used in the abortion debate. Based on the notion of moral personhood, the main groups of such arguments (no full moral status, full moral status, and gradualism) are identified and characterized. Separate consideration is given to the right of pregnant women to abortion, the legal defense of the fetus’ right to life, and the practice of using the medical concept of viability in law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nekhaev Andrei Viktorovich, Omsk State Technical University, Omsk, Russia

доктор философских наук, доцент (Россия), профессор кафедры «История, философия и социальные коммуникации» Омского государственного технического университета, г. Омск; профессор кафедры «Философия» Тюменского государственного университета, г. Тюмень;научный сотрудник Лаборатории логико-философских исследований Томского научного центра СО РАН, г. Томск.

Downloads


Abstract views: 49

Published

2024-05-21

How to Cite

Nekhaev А. В., C. Хольм, & Дж. Льюис. (2024). Abortion: pro et contra. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 9(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-2-120-131

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Philosophy

Categories

License

Non-exclusive rights to the article are transferred to the journal in full accordance with the Creative Commons License BY-NC-SA 4.0 «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Worldwide License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0»)

Creative Commons License