Nietzsche’s readings on Spinoza: a contextualist study, particularly on the reception of Kuno Fischer

Authors

  • Sommer Andreas Urs Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
  • Moskovets Semyon Andreevich Tomsk State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-2-111-131

Keywords:

Nietzsche, Spinoza, Kuno Fischer, teleology, eternal recurrence, amor fati, amor intellectualis dei, self-preservation.

Abstract

Nietzsche’s relation to Spinoza is highly puzzling. It was based mainly on secondary sources. This article explores for the first time what impact Nietzsche’s reading about Spinoza – particularly of Kuno Fischer’s History of Modern Philosophy — had on his conceptions. First, I consider how Nietzsche found a brother-in-arms in Spinoza upon leaving teleology behind. Second, I examine Nietzsche’s concept of eternal recurrence in the context of Spinoza’s teaching as it was presented by Fischer. Third, I investigate the relation between Nietzsche’s amor fati and Spinoza’s amor intellectualis dei. Finally, I discuss how the Spinozist concept of self-preservation (as it was modeled and discussed in nineteenth-century Spinoza research) became in the horizon of evolutionary theory a critical point for Nietzsche. It turns out that the knowledge of Nietzsche’s sources is fundamental for an adequate understanding of the use Nietzsche made of Spinoza’s philosophy. The article thus tries to find a new approach to Nietzsche’s Spinoza with the help of the contemporary sources he used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Moskovets Semyon Andreevich, Tomsk State University

Assistant of the Ontology, Theory of Knowledge and Social Philosophy Department, Tomsk State University, Tomsk. 

Downloads


Abstract views: 17

Published

2025-05-26

How to Cite

Sommer А. Ю., & Moskovets С. А. (2025). Nietzsche’s readings on Spinoza: a contextualist study, particularly on the reception of Kuno Fischer. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 10(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2025-10-2-111-131

Issue

Section

Philosophy

Categories