The critique of the theory of logical

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2022-7-4-96-100

Keywords:

Bernardete’s paradox, Zeno phenomenon, Zeno effect, logical causality, logical consequence

Abstract

One of the solutions to Bernardete’s paradox and a number of analogous paradoxes is based on the idea that there is a special type of causality — logical causality. This solution was proposed by Hawthorne and modified by Uzquiano. The paper presents a criticism on it. I put forward objections against Uzquiano’s modification of Hawthorne theory as well as against the very idea of logical causality. The conclusion is to the effect that, unless other reasons for the idea of logical causality are present, this idea either is trivial or lacks sufficient reason.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Evgeny Vasilyevich Borisov , Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher of Philosophy Department of the Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk.

Downloads


Abstract views: 25

Published

2022-12-23

How to Cite

Borisov Е. В. (2022). The critique of the theory of logical. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 7(4), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2022-7-4-96-100

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022)

Section

Philosophy

License

Non-exclusive rights to the article are transferred to the journal in full accordance with the Creative Commons License BY-NC-SA 4.0 «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Worldwide License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0»)

Creative Commons License