Buridan’s Sophisms, Alethic Predicates and Anaphoric Prosententialis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2022-7-3-49-56

Keywords:

Liar paradox, self-reference, Buridan’s sophisms, hypodoxes, anaphoric prosententialism

Abstract

The article presents a unified method for diagnosis and treatment various semantic pathologies (Buridan’s sophisms, Liar-like sentences, etc.). The basis of this approach is a modified version of prosententialism, in which the terms ʽtrueʼ and ʽfalseʼ are considered as markers for the types of relations between truth values of pathological sentences. Unlike Russell-Tarski hierarchical approach, it pays tribute to the intuitive claim of the semantic universality of natural languages (their ability to express own semantics).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Andrei Viktorovich Nekhaev, Omsk State Technical University, Omsk, Russia

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of History, Philosophy and Social Communications Department, Omsk State Technical University, Omsk; Professor of Philosophy Department, Tyumen State University, Tyumen; Research Associate of the Laboratory of Logical and Philosophical Studies, Tomsk Scientific Center, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences,
RAS, Tomsk.

Downloads


Abstract views: 17

Published

2022-09-28

How to Cite

Nekhaev А. В. (2022). Buridan’s Sophisms, Alethic Predicates and Anaphoric Prosententialis. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, 7(3), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2022-7-3-49-56

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Philosophy

License

Non-exclusive rights to the article are transferred to the journal in full accordance with the Creative Commons License BY-NC-SA 4.0 «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Worldwide License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0»)

Creative Commons License